By | Education | 03-Nov-2025 20:50:59
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed a fine of ₹8 lakh each on two prominent civil
services coaching institutes — Dikshant IAS
and Abhimanu IAS — for engaging in
misleading advertisements, unfair trade
practices, and violations of consumer rights under the Consumer
Protection Act, 2019.
The action follows complaints from successful UPSC candidates who accused the
institutes of using their names and
photographs without consent to falsely claim credit for their
achievements.
This comes close on the heels of similar penalties against other leading institutes — Drishti IAS, fined ₹5 lakh in October, and Vision IAS, which faced a ₹3 lakh penalty earlier this year — as the CCPA intensifies its scrutiny of deceptive advertising in India’s competitive coaching sector.
The CCPA acted on a complaint from Mini Shukla (AIR 96, UPSC 2021), who
said Dikshant IAS had misused
her image and name in promotional materials without permission. Shukla
clarified that she had no formal
association with the institute and had merely attended a mock interview jointly conducted with
another academy.
Investigations revealed that Dikshant IAS had
advertised “200+ Results in UPSC CSE
2021”, using names and photos of several successful candidates without
clarifying their actual engagement. Despite multiple chances, the institute
failed to produce credible proof backing its claims.
The authority found that these advertisements were deliberately misleading, designed to make aspirants believe the institute played a significant role in candidates’ success — when in reality, its involvement was minimal or nonexistent.
In another case, Natasha Goyal (AIR 175, UPSC 2022) reported that Abhimanu IAS had falsely portrayed her as a student and
used her photograph in advertisements without her consent.
CCPA’s inquiry uncovered inflated claims such
as “2200+ Selections since Inception”,
“10+ Selections in IAS Top 10”,
and even “1st Rank in HCS/PCS/HAS.”
These promotional materials featured the names and images of multiple
successful candidates across exams like UPSC,
HCS, RBI Grade-B, and NABARD
Grade-A, but failed to specify their actual association with the
institute.
Of the 139 claimed selections, investigations showed that 88 candidates had cleared stages of their exams independently, with Abhimanu IAS’s role limited to mock interviews or study material. The omissions were found to deceive aspirants and distort the institute’s contribution, violating consumer protection norms.
So far, the CCPA has issued 57 notices to various coaching centres
across the country for deceptive marketing and unfair practices. Cumulative
penalties of over ₹98.6 lakh
have been imposed on 27 institutes,
with explicit directions to cease
misleading promotions.
By holding coaching institutes accountable for exaggerated and false claims, the consumer body aims to safeguard aspirants from manipulation in an industry where hope, ambition, and trust are often monetized.