By | Career | 19-Mar-2026 12:02:52
India’s higher education boom is widening access—but not opportunity. The
latest findings from the Azim Premji University’s
State of Working India 2026 report reveal
a stark reality: professional degrees in medicine and engineering are
increasingly becoming the preserve of the wealthy.
While more students are entering colleges than
ever before, the path to high-value degrees remains sharply unequal. Limited
seats in subsidized government institutions and soaring fees in private
colleges are creating a financial wall that poorer families struggle to cross.
The report highlights that affordability—not
availability—is now the biggest barrier. As far back as 2017–18, the average
annual cost of a medical degree stood at ₹97,400, while engineering cost around
₹1,23,000 per year. These averages have since been eclipsed by significantly
higher fees in private institutions, where most students end up due to limited
public seats.
For low-income households, these costs are
prohibitive. When measured against annual per capita expenditure, pursuing
degrees in medicine or engineering often exceeds what poorer families can spend
in an entire year.
India’s higher education expansion has brought
more students from disadvantaged backgrounds into colleges—but not into the
same classrooms.
The share of students from the bottom two
income groups rose from 22% in 2007 to 32% in 2017–18, signaling improved
access. Yet, this progress masks a deeper divide. Wealthier students continue
to dominate professional courses that offer stronger job prospects and income
security.
In contrast, students from poorer families are
more likely to enrol in commerce and humanities streams—courses that are less
expensive but often yield lower economic returns.
The cost of professional education extends far
beyond tuition. Coaching classes, entrance exams, travel, and accommodation add
a substantial financial burden. For competitive exams alone, coaching expenses
can run into tens of thousands of rupees annually.
These cumulative costs make entry into elite
courses nearly impossible for many, reinforcing structural inequality.
The report underscores a compounding challenge
for low-income students. First, they face barriers in accessing higher
education itself. Second, even when they do make it to college, financial
constraints push them away from high-cost professional degrees.
This double disadvantage limits their access
to careers that offer stability and upward mobility, effectively locking in
economic inequality across generations.
By 2017–18, around 41% of graduate students
still came from the richest households, even as their dominance slightly
declined. Meanwhile, the share of students from the poorest quartile rose from
8% to 15%—a notable gain, but far from parity.
The imbalance is particularly troubling
because professional degrees are closely tied to better-paying, stable jobs.
When access to these pathways is dictated by income, the promise of education
as an equalizer begins to erode.
The findings make one point clear: expansion
alone cannot ensure equity. Without robust interventions—such as scholarships,
fee regulation, and targeted financial aid—professional education risks
becoming an exclusive domain of the affluent.
As India looks to harness its demographic dividend, the question is no longer about how many enter higher education—but who gets to pursue the degrees that shape the future.